Guidance for Ethical AI Use in College Applications

Helping Institutions Create Clear, Responsible Guidance for Applicants

This resource is intended as a guide to help institutions begin developing their own AI policies for the college admission process.*

  • At [Institution Name], we value honesty, originality, and personal growth. As AI tools like ChatGPT become more accessible, we believe it’s important to be transparent about how they may (and may not) be used in the college application process.

  • AI tools may be used much like a writing tutor or teacher, to support your thinking, not replace it.

    You may use AI tools to: - Brainstorm ideas or topics for your application - Help organize your thoughts or structure your writing - Refine grammar or improve clarity of your own words

  • The writing and ideas you submit should represent your voice and perspective.

    You should not use AI tools to: - Write full paragraphs or essays for you - Create your central message, argument, or story - Replace your tone or change your personal voice

  • (Option 1) Guiding Principles for Responsible AI Use in Your Application:

    • If your writing doesn’t sound like something you’d say aloud or explain in your own words, it probably isn’t yours—and shouldn’t be submitted.

    • If your writing suddenly sounds more advanced or polished than anything you’ve written before, take a moment to ask if it still sounds like you.

    • If you’re copying and pasting large portions of AI-generated text without major edits or rewriting in your own voice, you’ve likely gone too far.

    • If you feel uncomfortable taking full credit for what’s written, trust that instinct. Your application should reflect your authentic effort.

    (Option 2) A Few Quick Self-Checks 

    Before you submit, ask yourself:

    • Does this sound like something I’d say out loud or explain in my own words?

    • Does the tone or polish feel consistent with how I usually write?

    • Did I rely on AI to write this for me, rather than help me express my ideas?

    • Would I feel fully comfortable putting my name next to this?

  • At [Institution Name], we want to understand who you are, not who an algorithm thinks you should be. Your application is your opportunity to share your experiences, your voice, and your story. That’s something no AI can truly replicate.

    Remember: Admissions isn’t looking for perfection. We’re looking for perspective, potential, and your unique story. Use the tools you have to be your best self, not someone else's version of you.

  • This guidance applies to all written and creative parts of your application, including short answers, activity descriptions, supplemental essays, and any optional materials you submit.

    If you’re submitting multimedia, creative work, or video responses, be thoughtful about how AI tools are used to support (not replace) your original effort.

  • We recognize that students have different levels of access to technology and support. Using AI tools is not required or expected, and your application will not be evaluated differently based on whether or not you used them.

  • This statement was developed using AI tools to test tone and clarity, but all final language and intent were created and reviewed by humans. That’s the kind of thoughtful use we encourage from our applicants as well.

Best Practice Sources: Modeled on effective AI guidance from Georgia Tech, Bucknell University, and Washington and Lee University. Refer to our growing padlet of AI policies related to college admission.

Tip: Avoid vague policies that treat all AI use as cheating. Clear, supportive guidance fosters honesty, equity, and student learning.

*This resource is intended as a starting point, not a substitute for institutional policy, legal review, or official guidance. It reflects best practice suggestions from the AI in College Admission Special Interest Group (SIG) and represents the views of the author (Emily Pacheco), not those of NACAC or its official Guide to Ethical Practice in College Admission. Before adopting or sharing any public-facing AI guidance for applicants, schools and universities should consult with relevant campus representatives, including legal counsel, communications teams, and academic leadership. Each institution’s context, values, and policies may differ, and any adaptation or adoption of any portion of this template should be carefully reviewed and approved through internal processes. If you have questions or comments please reach out to info@aica.ai.